My network consists of 2x … NFS can be setup to back up your computer files to the tape drive, or any ones files on the network, just as easily as it can backup its own files. I don't use Windows but I assume the Windows version of Kodi will be able to access NFS shares no differently.

NFS is usually UDP, but most daemons can be ran in TCP mode too. SuperUser reader user334875 wants to know what the difference is between FTPS and SFTP, and which one is better: I am trying to set up a system for four of my employees who work remotely so that they can transfer files. I did assign NFS a "High Priority" but there was no impact on performance. The mount command options rsize and wsize specify the size of the chunks of data that the client and server pass back and forth to each other. My question is, does the speed increase is significant enough to go through the hassle of setting it on Windows? If no rsize and wsize options are specified, the default varies by which version of NFS we are using. It could upload the file at speeds over 35MBps, which is great. Personally I use NFS with my Open Media Vault server. Of course, this all varies by speed of the machine speed, disks, connection type, etc.

Version control is possible with NFS, where with FTP it is not (unless you have a brilliant hacker out there who really needs to … Addition of RDMA to NFS style protocol, (probable) high performance in clusters and server farms. Streaming & Network. On a normal 100mbit/full duplex lan they would both pull roughly the same speeds. JB1970.

SMB vs NFS vs FTP. unwittinglyrad. (see NFS v4) Weaknesses. Between NFS and Samba shares, I've read that NFS is faster than Samba, however Samba is easier to set up on Windows. The Question. Since there are less(no) ack's with UDP, there would be less communication from the client to the server. My download speed from the server is about 1.5 megabytes/second and listing the contents of a directory of 1000 items takes about 60 seconds. * I downloaded Helios Lantest and found that NFS and CIFS are in the same ballpark regarding performance, but WebDAV for example is much faster. I was hoping for a bit higher speed, so I created a FTP share and tried uploading a large file through FTP. ... (VU ultimo 4k) as NAS, and I prefer ftp protocol to copy my rips to NAS than I have better speed write ~90MB/s read 65MB/s. ... (like FTP vs NFS) but don't allow static limits. May 11, 2020, ... I’d added the server as NFS.

May 11, 2020, 5:28pm #11. unproven, lack of client support, perceived competition with NFS v4 (see NFS v4) HTTP/WebDAV Strengths.