NFS is better and fortunately my Synology NAS supports NFS so I did some tests. Enable the SMB service, protocol 2 and 3. encryption mode disabled, opportunistic locking enabled I disabled the NFS rules just to check out the new speeds, and now I find myself with 90/110 Mb/sec I really appreciate the help from you guys, it's so good to ask for help and to receive so much information Let's start with Synology. Trying to find out what's the best way to go. Under User. It does run great though as it plays 4k without any problem. Last post 11-06-2018, 11:55 AM by JCutter03. Both were mounted and tested separately, meaning I disconnected AFP before mounting and testing SMB. NFS Permissions - Add clients by their IP address, privilege - Read/Write, Squash - Map all users to admin, Enable Asynchronous, Allow from non-privileged ports, allow users to access mounted subfolders . NFS through kodi. I mounted this my my Mac using the basic "Connect to Server" option in Finder and typing in "afp://server:share" and "smb://server:share" for the tests. ; June 2016 Windows 10 Pro (18) The server takes the requested action and returns a response. If you don’t use SMB (Samba / Windows File Shares), you can make some optimizations which will free up substantial system resources. Especially if you have to deal with 100 GByte of photos and music files in 1000 directories you will love the speed of NFS. I'm not sure if this is the best way to connect it to my nas. A much better solution is to disable SMB1 on the Synology. AFP vs. SMB and NFS file sharing for network clients. Hi All, I can't quite find the answer to this question. It is better suitable for server to server file transfer.

SMB 3 did not helped but I figured out that I can authenticate without any problem when using the IP Address instead of the DNS Name. Thanks I read on this subreddit they can ssh into your NAS and resolve so I tried it. SMB/AFP/NFS - Enable NFS . ‘Disable’ SMB1 on Synology. Your wisdom is appreciated. Synology DS412+ NAS running 4 disks in RAID 5. Native file sharing protocols always win out In an intranet, network clients have several options, such as AFP, NFS and SMB/CIFS, to connect to their file server. CIFS is a public or open variation of the Server Message Block Protocol (SMB) developed and used by Microsoft, and it uses the TCP/IP protocol. You change an advanced setting in SMB to say the Minimum SMB protocol is SMB2.

Comparing CIFS vs. NFS, CIFS tends to be a bit more “chatty” in its communications. Especially for Mac clients using SMB with Linux such as a Synology NAS – SMB/Synology NAS can't handle Apple special characters. NFS and CIFS are the primary file systems used in NAS. NFS vs ISCSI vs CIFS (SMB) Storage. That brought me to the idea that this might be a networking issue and in fact it was: When pinging the Synology, Windows 10 preferred IPv6 over IPv4. Performance seems to be faster than SMB though. In my case, I don’t use any file services, and only use my Synology NAS (Synology DS1813+) as an NFS and iSCSI datastore. NFS vs ISCSI vs CIFS (SMB) Storage. But for the best performance, and 100% compatibility, the native client file sharing protocol is … Single Client Performance - CIFS, NFS and iSCSI The single client CIFS performance of the Synology DS1812+ was evaluated on the Windows platforms using Intel NASPT and our standard robocopy benchmark. Under Shared Folder - Share_name (TV_1 in my case) Edit. The second set of tests were run after setting up a NFS share and removing the Windows File Sharing option to remove the SMB shares. Centralizacja przechowywania danych i tworzenia kopii zapasowych, usprawnienie współpracy nad plikami, optymalizacja zarządzania wideo i bezpieczne wdrażanie sieci w … Open Synology NAS admin web GUI.

Navigate to Control Panel > File Services.Under SMB click Advanced Settings and set Minimum SMB Protocol to SMB2.